Imagine spending an afternoon browsing Amazon, reading hundreds of five-star reviews, watching comparison videos, and ultimately adding the Mika Micky bassinet to your cart because it seemed like the wise, cost-effective option—a highly regarded substitute for the $200 HALO at half the price. For thousands of parents nationwide, that was their experience. And nothing went wrong for the majority of them. It ended badly for at least one family in Shoreview, Minnesota.
Summer Sullivan, a five-month-old infant, was put to sleep in a Mika Micky bedside bassinet at her family’s house on February 16, 2023. She didn’t make it. About Lawsuits Redline Commerce Inc., the manufacturer that uses the Mika Micky brand, and Amazon were named as defendants in a wrongful death lawsuit filed by her father, David Sullivan, in a Minnesota state court.
| Product Information | Values |
|---|---|
| Product Name | Mika Micky Bedside Sleeper / Bassinet |
| Manufacturer | Redline Commerce Inc. (d/b/a Mika Micky) |
| Primary Retail Channel | Amazon.com (now largely unavailable) |
| Reported Safety Issue | Unlevel sleeping surface; suffocation risk due to soft, insufficiently firm sides |
| Official CPSC Recall Status | No formal recall issued as of early 2026 |
| Known Incident | Death of five-month-old Summer Sullivan, Shoreview, Minnesota (February 2023) |
| Legal Action | Wrongful death lawsuit filed by David Sullivan against Amazon and Redline Commerce |
| Current Availability | Discontinued; only available secondhand |
| Safe Sleep Authority | CPSC.gov |
According to the lawsuit, the bassinet’s design was flawed in a way that significantly raised the risk of suffocation. Specifically, parts of the bassinet’s sides were not firm enough, creating areas where a baby’s face could press against the material and restrict airflow in potentially lethal ways. About Lawsuits The complaint claims that even when the product was properly assembled and used as intended, it was unreasonably dangerous.
It’s worth taking a moment to consider that distinction. Parents weren’t abusing this product. User carelessness or assembly errors are not the subject of the accusations. The lawsuit claims that Amazon sold and distributed the product without sufficiently confirming its safety for infant sleep, and that Redline
Commerce knew or should have known about the design’s suffocation risk before putting it on the market. Regarding lawsuits, it remains to be seen if a court will ultimately accept that framing. However, the larger issue—a product linked to a baby’s death that has virtually disappeared from retail outlets without a formal government recall—raises concerns that go far beyond the tragedy of this particular family.
As of early 2026, the Consumer Product Safety Commission had not issued a formal recall for the Mika Micky bassinet. For more than a year, parents in online communities have been perplexed and irritated by this fact. Amazon’s listing for the product vanished. The website of the manufacturer went down. Major retail platforms’ searches for the bassinet either yielded no results or led to used listings on Facebook Marketplace and resale websites.
Babies rolling to one side and pressing against the mesh panels were reported by some parents as a result of the bassinet’s uneven surface. About Lawsuits: a pattern that eerily consistently echoes the issues brought up by the Sullivan lawsuit. However, the product technically remained in a regulatory gray area, sitting in nurseries across the nation, passed down from friend to friend, and sold at garage sales because no formal recall was issued.
Unfortunately, this is not a special circumstance in the market for baby sleep products. The pattern is recognizable. Bassinets and cradles accounted for about 22% of the 523 children under five who died in nursery product incidents in the United States between 2019 and 2021—roughly 115 fatalities during that time alone.
The most well-known cautionary example was MedLegal360 Fisher-Price’s Rock ‘n Play sleeper. Only after deaths increased did the CPSC announce a nationwide recall of all Rock ‘n Play models, and Fisher-Price eventually had to pay a $19 million settlement in 2024 after years of wrongful death lawsuits. About Lawsuits: The Mika Micky case has a similar early-stage trajectory, with reports mounting, the product vanishing from stores, a lawsuit being filed, and a regulatory response still pending. It’s actually not clear if it goes the same distance.
As this develops, it seems like the system for shielding parents from dangerous baby products is moving far more slowly than the internet’s capacity to market those products. Amazon offered Prime delivery for the Mika Micky bassinet. It took roughly three minutes to purchase.
The bassinet’s purported design flaw directly violated the American Academy of Pediatrics’ safe sleep guidelines, which advise babies to sleep on their backs on a firm, flat surface (MedLegal360). When a parent is holding a newborn at two in the morning and must decide between this bassinet and no sleep at all, the discrepancy between what the guidelines require and what a product actually delivers may not always be apparent.
The advice is simple for anyone who currently owns a Mika Micky bassinet, whether it was given as a gift, bought used, or has been sitting in a storage closet since a first child outgrew it: stop using it. The combination of a reported infant death, an ongoing lawsuit alleging design flaws, and the manufacturer’s apparent withdrawal from the market is more than enough cause for caution—not because the CPSC has issued a recall order.
The lack of an official recall notice does not imply approval. It is more accurately described as a gap in a system that sometimes fails to keep up with parents’ demands. For the most up-to-date information on any baby product, always visit the CPSC’s official recall database at cpsc.gov. The bar for “good enough” when it comes to a newborn’s sleeping quarters should be far higher than that of a product that hasn’t yet been officially condemned.
